Caledonian Mercury: Scottish news, stories and intelligent analysis from Scotland's first truly online newspaper

West Highland Way goes the extra mile but which one’s the dullest?

January 26, 2010 by Dave Hewitt · 4 Comments 

 
 
Beinn Dorain

On Beinn Dorain

So 30 years after its official opening, the West Highland Way (WHW) is to be extended by a mile at its northern end.

Good plan: it makes a lot of sense to take the thing right into the middle of Fort William and increase the trade opportunities in these straitened times. After all, the WHW starts in the middle of Milngavie, so there will be now a neat symmetry. But the upping of the total mileage from 95 to 96 raises an interesting point. Were the change to be made but the distance retained at 95 miles, which
mid-route mile ought to get the chop?

Which is the dullest mile of the West Highland Way?

Here are five candidates:

Mile 1, Milngavie – Research by moneysupermarket.com has revealed the startling fact that more than half of male drivers aged between 17 and 21 in Milngavie have a speeding conviction. It’s clearly not safe to walk the roads in those parts, so best skip straight to Mugdock woods.

Mile 37, east side of Loch Lomond – Scotland’s most sung-about loch is a lovely thing, for sure, but it is rather long. Given the prospect of 19 miles spent plodding along tracks and paths on its eastern shore, few Fort William-bound walkers would complain were a mile to be chopped out somewhere north of Inversnaid.

Mile 58, beneath Beinn Dorain – There are a couple of deadly dull bits of the WHW on the Crianlarich to Bridge of Orchy stretch: nice enough views, but if you can see the views then surely there is frustration at being confined to the glen rather than romping around on the tops? Mile 58 is particularly trudgesome, with the famous conical view of Beinn Dorain having passed, likewise the interesting-for-trainspotters Auch viaduct. A pint at the Bridge of Orchy Hotel is not far ahead, admittedly, but it’s likely to be served by one of any number of Antipodean bar staff.

Mile 76, Devil’s Staircase – Controversial, but you know it makes sense. Who actually likes the Devil’s Staircase? Hardly anyone, and almost everyone in the Karrimat brigade seems to moan about its sloggy 250-metre climb. The standard direction of travel for the WHW is south–north, so chugging up the Staircase means having one’s back to the stonkingly spectacular stuff at the head of Glen Coe.

Mile 88, west of the Lairigmor – Footsore and underfed, you’ll be wanting the fleshpots of the Fort by now. So why is the damn route taking this massive detour round the Mamores, through various tatty bits of old forestry, when by far the best line is over the Mamore ridge to Glen Nevis direct, using one of the wonderful stalker’s paths that adorn the range?

Mileages taken from the Harvey map of the route.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • email
  • Reddit
  • Slashdot
  • StumbleUpon
  • Mixx
  • Fark
  • Technorati

Related posts:

  1. 100ish-mile event kicks off in Dunkeld t’s the time of year for big, arduous events. Long...
  2. High jinks over Sport Relief map of celebfest cycle ’m curious about something and could do with a bit...
  3. Long slog to disprove Sport Relief ‘Everest’ claim Three weeks ago, I wrote a piece sceptical of a...

Comments

4 Responses to “West Highland Way goes the extra mile but which one’s the dullest?”
  1. George Anderson says:

    Its a long while since I have done it but I have done it twice.

    I would have to say the northern part of Loch Lomond is the worst. Up and down burn gullies under trees for a day.

    Don’t recall having to walk roads at Milnegavie. It certainly used to start in a shopping centre but took you immediately into a riverside walk and country park.

    Report This Comment

  2. Calum H says:

    Shouldn’t the southern end now be extended into Glasgow from Milngavie? The walk would reach the over-a-hundred-miles length that it annoyingly and tantalisingly misses. This would satisfy numerology fetishists, and give a few more miles to think about cutting out, as the walk right into Glasgow city centre would cause the whole route to go up to a few miles over the hundred. The contrast between the city centre part of the route and the rest would epitomise much that is satisfying about walking in Scotland, where the urban and the stravaigin’ wilds are often linked in any walker’s experience. And that start in Milngavie’s dreich wee shopping centre is not exactly memorable. A start (or finish) in somewhere like Kelvingrove park would surely be a big improvement.

    Report This Comment

  3. Jeffrey D says:

    Any chance the powers that be could remove the mile or so just north of Balmaha. Throughout the summer this stretch seems to attract Buckfast swilling, techno blareing, hot hatch driving neds to every bay along the loch. Its not a great advert for the Scottish turist board.

    Foreign hikers walking the WHW must get a shock, having to negotiate all the empty lager cans, Irn Bru bottles and fruit shoots (fur the waynes), whilst admiring our beautiful Scottish scenery.

    Report This Comment

Trackbacks

Check out what others are saying about this post...
  1. [...] the West Highland Way opened, it has extended its route a mile into Fort William town centre. The Caledonian Mercury asks which mile you would REMOVE from the route, ie which is the walk’s dullest spot? Dave [...]

    Report This Comment



Speak Your Mind

Tell us what you're thinking...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!